Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to the confidentiality of peer support communications for public safety officers and civilian employees
Sponsored by the House Public Safety Committee
Topics:Public safety & emergencies
Same legislation: HSB 652
Progress
- IntroducedFebruary 3, 2026
- SubcommitteeFebruary 4, 2026
- CommitteeFebruary 17, 2026
- Passed House—
- Passed Senate—
- Signed—
Became HF 2637 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to HF 2637 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
This bill relates to the confidentiality of peer support communications for public safety officers.1 (peace officer, public safety, and emergency personnel bill of rights) by providing that the peace officer, public safety, and emergency personnel bill of rights does not require the disclosure, use, or consideration of confidential peer support communications in any informal inquiry, formal administrative investigation, disciplinary proceeding, or Brady-Giglio determination.10 (communications in professional confidence) and creates new Code chapter 622C relating to the evidentiary privilege of peer support communications.
Read the full explanation
The bill defines “civilian employee” as an employee of a law enforcement agency, emergency management agency, emergency medical services agency, or fire department who is not an officer. The bill also defines “confidential communication”, “officer”, and “peer support counselor”. The bill provides that, except as otherwise specified, a peer support counselor or an individual present for a confidential communication is not permitted to testify or disclose confidential communications made by an officer or a civilian employee during peer support or crisis intervention sessions. The bill further provides that confidential communications cannot be used or introduced in any formal administrative investigation, disciplinary proceeding, or Brady-Giglio disclosure or proceeding, except as otherwise provided or as constitutionally required. The bill allows peer support counselors or individuals present for a confidential communication to testify or otherwise disclose a confidential communication that includes a plan to commit a crime or information related to the commission of a crime, a threat of harm to oneself or others, or information required by law to be disclosed. The bill provides that new Code chapter 622C does not limit an employer’s authority to direct an employee to an employee assistance program or to require a fitness-for-duty evaluation, and the chapter is to be construed liberally to promote candid and confidential communications during peer support services for public safety professionals.
From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text
History
Meetings
- Tuesday, February 17 · 9:00 AMPublic Safety committee · RM 19Official meeting page
- Wednesday, February 11 · 10:30 AMPublic Safety committee · RM 19Official meeting page
- Wednesday, February 4 · 12:45 PMPublic Safety subcommittee · House Lounge 2Official meeting page
Votes
Select a floor vote to see how each legislator voted.
Lobbyist declarations
- City of WaukeeFor
- Iowa Chapter of the Association of Public Safety Communications Officials (APCO)For
- Iowa Chapter of the National Emergency Number Association (NENA)For
- Iowa County Attorneys AssociationFor
- Iowa Emergency Management AssociationFor
- Iowa Firefighters Association (IFA)For
- Iowa Fraternal Order of PoliceFor
- Iowa Police Chief Association (FKA Iowa Police Executive Forum)For
- Iowa State Sheriffs' & Deputies' AssociationFor
- Iowa Board of RegentsUndecided
- Iowa Peace Officers AssociationUndecided
Grouped by organization. Lobbying overview →