Bills › 91st General Assembly
Relating to the operation of driverless-capable vehicles, including associated civil and criminal liability, and making penalties applicable
Sponsored by the Senate Transportation Committee
Progress
- IntroducedJanuary 21, 2026
- SubcommitteeFebruary 5, 2026
- CommitteeFebruary 18, 2026
- Passed Senate—
- Passed House—
- Signed—
Became SF 2384 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2384 What’s a funnel?
What’s in it
Under current law, a driverless-capable vehicle equipped with an automated driving system and meeting certain requirements is authorized to operate on highways while performing all real-time operational and tactical functions (dynamic driving task) regardless of whether a conventional human driver is present in the vehicle.519 and all applicable traffic and motor vehicle safety laws. This bill prohibits a driverless-capable vehicle transporting hazardous material from operating without a conventional human driver.
Read the full explanation
secretary of transportation to be capable of posing an unreasonable risk to health, safety, and property when transported in commerce, and which has been so designated.482. A simple misdemeanor is punishable by confinement for no more than days and a fine of at least $105 but not more than $855. Under current law, an automated driving system that is capable of performing the entire dynamic driving task must be designed to operate within the system’s operational design domain in compliance with the applicable traffic and motor vehicle safety laws and regulations that govern the performance of the dynamic driving task, unless an exemption has been granted to the vehicle by the department of transportation. The bill rephrases this provision to require the system to operate within the system’s operational design domain rather than be designed to operate in that manner. The bill imputes liability to the owner of a driverless-capable vehicle for personal injury, death, or property damage that results in connection with the operation of the vehicle and for violations of traffic or motor vehicle safety laws and regulations. A person who modifies an automated driving system of a driverless-capable vehicle without the manufacturer’s consent is liable for any damage related to the operation of the vehicle, unless the owner of the vehicle directed the person to modify the system, in which case the owner is liable.
From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Amendments adopted later aren’t reflected. Full bill text
History
Meetings
- Wednesday, February 18 · 1:00 PMTransportation committee · RM 116Official meeting page
- Tuesday, February 17 · 1:00 PMTransportation committee · RM 103Official meeting page
- Monday, February 16 · 12:15 PMTransportation subcommittee · House LoungeOfficial meeting page
- Thursday, February 5 · 12:00 PMTransportation subcommittee · Room 217 Conference RoomOfficial meeting page
Votes
No recorded votes yet.
Lobbyist declarations
- TeslaAgainst
- AFSCME Council 61For
- Iowa Federation of Labor, AFL-CIOFor
- ABATE of IowaUndecided
- Alliance For Automotive InnovationUndecided
- Cedar Rapids Metro Economic AllianceUndecided
- Independent Insurance Agents of IowaUndecided
- Iowa Association for JusticeUndecided
- Iowa Board of RegentsUndecided
- Iowa Dept. of TransportationUndecided
- Iowa Motor Truck AssociationUndecided
- Iowa Police Chief Association (FKA Iowa Police Executive Forum)Undecided
- Teamsters Local 238Undecided
- TeslaUndecided
- Uber Technologies, Inc.Undecided
Grouped by organization. Lobbying overview →