Bills › 91st General Assembly

SF 2457Renumbered as SF 2475 · March 25, 2026

Relating to abandoned vehicles, and making appropriations

Sponsored by the Senate Commerce Committee

Same legislation: HSB 559, SSB 3061, HSB 667, HF 2617, SF 2475

Also covers HSB 559 and SSB 3061 and HSB 667 and HF 2617 and SF 2475.

Progress

  1. Introduced
    January 22, 2026
  2. Subcommittee
    February 5, 2026
  3. Committee
    February 19, 2026
  4. Passed Senate
    —
  5. Passed House
    —
  6. Signed
    —

Became SF 2457 → Its progress continues under the new number. Go to SF 2457 What’s a funnel?

What’s in it

89. Current law requires an entity that takes custody of an abandoned vehicle to send notice by certified mail to all known claimants of the vehicle no more than days after taking custody of the vehicle. This bill requires such notice to be sent no more than days after taking custody of the vehicle. Under current law and the bill, notice is deemed given when mailed. Current law requires a person to ask for a hearing regarding an abandoned vehicle, or reclaim an abandoned vehicle and personal property left inside such vehicle, within days after notice is mailed.

Read the full explanation

The bill extends the reclamation period to days. If notice is not provided and a private entity or police authority takes custody of the vehicle and sells the vehicle at auction, the bill requires payment to the lienholder from the auction proceeds as much as those proceeds can cover of the remainder owed on the vehicle loan before paying the vehicle owner. The bill authorizes a private entity that takes a vehicle into custody to charge towing, preservation, storage, or other fees during the first hours after taking custody of a vehicle. After hours, towing, preservation, and storage fees do not accrue until the vehicle owner, lienholders, and any known claimants are notified. A claim by a private entity for payment of all such fees is invalid when a private entity fails to send notice. Under the bill, a lienholder or insurance company who receives notice may request information regarding the condition of the vehicle. The private entity having custody of the vehicle may charge an inspection fee not to exceed $100. An inspection may be in person or the private entity is authorized to provide photos of the vehicle sufficient to reasonably ascertain the condition of the vehicle. A private entity must comply with an inspection request prior to the expiration of the 20-day reclamation period. The bill authorizes a person to reclaim personal property from within the vehicle without paying reclamation fees, so long as the property is not attached to the vehicle, only once while the vehicle is in custody of a private entity. The bill requires a private entity with custody of an abandoned vehicle to provide an itemized account of all fees assessed when the vehicle is reclaimed. Under current law, if an abandoned vehicle is not reclaimed, it can be sold at public auction or for junk or scrap if it is determined to not be appropriate for highway use. The bill directs how proceeds of a sold abandoned vehicle are distributed. If proper notice was provided, a private entity or police authority may reimburse itself only for costs incurred, except costs of bookkeeping and other administrative costs. Any remainder from the proceeds of a sale must be held first for any lienholder of record, if applicable, for days after notice of the sale is provided, and second for any owner of record for an additional days. Current law only requires a police authority to hold proceeds from a sale for both the lienholder and owner for days. The bill requires any remaining proceeds to be deposited in the statutory allocations fund (SAF) rather than the road use tax fund. A private entity that was hired by a police authority must be paid from the SAF the amount incurred by the entity that was not otherwise recouped by the entity from the sale. The person or persons who owned the vehicle when it was taken into custody are jointly and severally liable for reimbursing the SAF for those costs. Pursuant to current law, revenues remaining in the SAF at the end of a fiscal year are credited to the road use tax fund. After the sale of an abandoned vehicle, the bill requires a private entity or police authority who sold the vehicle at auction, within days after the sale, to send notice by certified mail to the person who owned the vehicle when it was taken into custody and to any lienholders of record detailing the amount of proceeds remaining and the timeline for claiming the proceeds. The department of transportation (DOT) is required to adopt administrative rules providing a claims procedure for police authorities to obtain expenses and costs from the SAF, for private entities to remit excess proceeds to the SAF, and for payment from the SAF for expenses and costs incurred by a police authority or private entity hired by a police authority. If a private entity was hired by a police authority, the police authority must file a claim with the DOT for reimbursement of the private entity’s costs.3. Pursuant to current law, a consumer who suffers an ascertainable loss of money or property as the result of a prohibited practice or act in violation of Code chapter 714H may bring an action at law to recover actual damages. The court may order such equitable relief, including reasonable attorney fees, as it deems necessary to protect the public from further violations, including temporary and permanent injunctive relief. If the finder of fact finds by a preponderance of clear, convincing, and satisfactory evidence that a prohibited practice or act constitutes willful and wanton disregard for the rights or safety of another, in addition to an award of actual damages, statutory damages up to three times the amount of actual damages may be awarded to a prevailing consumer. A consumer must bring a consumer fraud action within two years of the occurrence of the event giving rise to the cause of action or within two years of the discovery of the violation, whichever is later. Because the bill places additional requirements on police authorities and private entities beyond the notice requirements under current law, the bill strikes certain provisions limiting claims or rights when proper notice is provided or after the reclamation period. The bill instead provides that if proper notice is provided and the persons receiving notice do not ask for a hearing before the police authority or reclaim the vehicle or personal property within the 20-day reclaiming period, the owner, lienholders, or claimants shall not have a right to, title in, claim for, or interest in the vehicle or personal property in the vehicle.90, such rights and claims are limited only if proper notice is provided.

From the explanation printed with the bill as introduced, written by the Legislative Services Agency. Changed since by amendments S-5245, H-8140; see Amendments. Full bill text

Amendments · 3

2 adopted · 0 failed · 1 pending. Newest first.

  • H-8460Strike everything · filed May 1, 2026 by
    Replaces the whole bill with new text.
    Pending
  • S-5245Strike everything · filed May 1, 2026 by Sen. Mike Bousselot (R)
    Replaces the whole bill with new text.
    Adopted
    May 1, 2026
  • H-8140 · filed March 4, 2026
    Adopted
    March 4, 2026

History

2026 session · second year of the 91st General Assembly
March 25, 2026
Committee report approving bill, renumbered as SF 2475. S.J. 646. Journal
March 4, 2026
Subcommittee recommends passage.
February 24, 2026
Subcommittee: Bousselot, Blake, and Koelker. S.J. 394. Journal
February 23, 2026
Committee report, approving bill. S.J. 365. Journal
February 23, 2026
Introduced, placed on calendar. S.J. 360. Journal
February 19, 2026
As SSB 3061: Committee report approving bill, renumbered as SF 2457.
February 5, 2026
As SSB 3061: Subcommittee recommends passage.
January 28, 2026
As SSB 3061: Subcommittee reassigned: Bousselot, Knox, and Webster.
January 22, 2026
As SSB 3061: Subcommittee: Bousselot, Drey, and Webster.
January 22, 2026
As SSB 3061: Introduced, referred to Commerce.

Meetings

Votes

No recorded votes yet.

Lobbyist declarations

For · 7Against · 4Undecided · 17

Grouped by organization. Lobbying overview →